[OAM-talk] Completing the OAM PSC election process

[Jeffrey Johnson]

+1 ... too many chiefs and no indians

On Dec 8, 2009, at 18:02, Brian Russo <brian at beruna.org> wrote:

> I think if people are too preoccupied with being on an official  
> committee or having this title and that nothing will ever get done.  
> If people have good ideas we should use them. The purpose of people  
> in charge is to generate progress; not to generate all the ideas..  
> Little of the discussion on this list over the past few days seems  
> to have been very productive IMO.
>
> candidly,
> - bri
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Schuyler Erle <schuyler at nocat.net>  
> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:25 -0800, Christopher Lippitt wrote:
> > It seems to me that the PSC can always ask community members to
> > make recommendations based on specific needs, even in the form of a
> > committee if needed, but that expanding the OAM 'administration'  
> seems
> > a bit premature at this point.
>
> Based on the response, I can see that I was probably off base. You're
> all right, of course.
>
> Let me withdraw my initial suggestion and make an alterate proposal:  
> Why
> don't we stick with the voting results, and wait to add new members to
> the PSC until we find the need for more and different kinds of  
> people on
> board? Would anyone object to this?
>
> SDE
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openaerialmap.org
> http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openaerialmap.org
> http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openaerialmap.org/pipermail/talk_openaerialmap.org/attachments/20091208/3971fa48/attachment.html>