I think if people are too preoccupied with being on an official committee or having this title and that nothing will ever get done. If people have good ideas we should use them. The purpose of people in charge is to generate progress; not to generate all the ideas.. Little of the discussion on this list over the past few days seems to have been very productive IMO.<br>
<br>candidly,<br>- bri<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Schuyler Erle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:schuyler@nocat.net">schuyler@nocat.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:25 -0800, Christopher Lippitt wrote:<br>
> It seems to me that the PSC can always ask community members to<br>
> make recommendations based on specific needs, even in the form of a<br>
> committee if needed, but that expanding the OAM 'administration' seems<br>
> a bit premature at this point.<br>
<br>
</div>Based on the response, I can see that I was probably off base. You're<br>
all right, of course.<br>
<br>
Let me withdraw my initial suggestion and make an alterate proposal: Why<br>
don't we stick with the voting results, and wait to add new members to<br>
the PSC until we find the need for more and different kinds of people on<br>
board? Would anyone object to this?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
SDE<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openaerialmap.org">talk@openaerialmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org" target="_blank">http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>